Date:	Mon, 5 Jun 2000 17:16:27 -0700
From:	Drew Streib <ds@valinux.com>
To:	Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
Subject: Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying reiserfs  integration)

On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 04:58:43PM -0700, Chris Mason wrote:
> But, reiserfs 3.6 has come a long way.  I feel it is worth putting into
> the kernel soon (I would love to see reports of *heavy* testing), and I
> don't feel the lack of a completed generic journal layer is a good enough
> reason to keep it out.

How about *heavy* production use?

http://ftp.sourceforge.net/ has 850GB storage, half of which is reiserfs,
half is ext2. Both filesystems have been running flawlessly for > 4 months
of production (actually longer, but wasn't reiserfs before). That server
pushes between 15Mbit and 50Mbit/sec, and pulls/syncs about 2-5Mbit/sec,
24x7.

reiserfs also powers the CVS tree filesystem for cvs-mirror.mozilla.org
(also tokyojoe.sourceforge.net), which is the one and only anonymous CVS
checkout point for mozilla. That server has run flawlessly under very
heavy load since its birth.

I don't get involved in kernel politics, but as a production filesystem,
reiserfs is ok in my book.

-drew

-- 
-------
Drew Streib <d@valinux.com> 408.542.5725

Technical Marketing Manager, VA Linux Systems | <dtype@valinux.com>
Sr Developer, Community Liason, SourceForge   | <dtype@sourceforge.net>
System Administrator, Linux International     | <dtype@li.org>
Admirer, Occasional Programmer, Linux.com     | <dtype@linux.com>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/