From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To:	lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)
Subject: Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux 
Date:	Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:45:33 +0100


lm@bitmover.com said:
>   I'm 100% in agreement with the idea that all code paths through the
> kernel should be short and sweet, but that isn't always the case.  All
> it takes is one misbehaving driver that hangs onto the CPU too long
> and you missed your deadline.

Don't Do That Then. The driver is broken, not the model. Fix it.

It ought to be possible to devise a test for debugging drivers, similar in
concept to the slab poisoning, which will BUG() if a process has blocked for
too long. Could the NMI watchdog or something similar be extended to do
this? Would we get a useful backtrace?

This can automatically find many of the instances of badly-behaved code 
which causes high latency, but can also be turned off in production kernels.


--
dwmw2



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/