From:	 Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To:	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches
Date:	 26 Aug 2001 21:57:43 -0400
Cc:	 nigel@nrg.org

Available at:

http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.9-preempt-kernel-1
http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.8-ac12-preempt-kernel-1

for kernel 2.4.9 and 2.4.8-ac12, respectively.

This is a straight update of Nigel Gamble's Linux kernel preemption
patch from http://kpreempt.sourceforge.net, updated for the above
kernels.  Thus, this is Nigel's code -- I merely updated it.

I am eager to see work done on the patch and to see what its future may
be.  If you are in any way interested in application latency or
real-time support, I suggest you check this out.  If you are just
curious, its an interesting patch none-the-less.

Some benchmarks:

kernel 2.4.8-ac12 (nonpreempt):
dbench 16:
Throughput 12.9453 MB/sec (NB=16.1816 MB/sec  129.453 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 76.0099 MB/sec (NB=95.0123 MB/sec  760.099 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:35.51 (386.34s user, 23.41s system)

kernel 2.4.8-ac12 with preemptible kernel patch:
dbench 16:
Throughput 13.3579 MB/sec (NB=16.6974 MB/sec  133.579 MBit/sec)
dbench 1:
Throughput 31.4971 MB/sec (NB=39.3714 MB/sec  314.971 MBit/sec)
kernel compile (make dep clean bzImage):
7:23.26 (387.10s user, 23.42s system)

The performance increase in kernel compile and dbench 16 is decent, but
the decrease in dbench 1 is odd.  I am curious what numbers others find.
My "how does it feel" benchmark is that bandwidth seems similar while
multitasking may be a tad smoother with the patch.

-- 
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/